Search for: "DRUG EMPORIUM, INC."
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2015, 3:35 pm
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 8:27 am
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 10:10 am
Food Emporium: NJ 13. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 10:01 pm
A similar warning letter, this one dated Jan. 19, was sent to Monte’s Seafood Emporium, Inc. in the Bronx. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 9:09 pm
Diabetic Emporium and Confectionary Shoppe, Ltd - 8 oz. and 16 oz. packages of Diabetic Emporium Chocolate Covered Peanuts; 17. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:00 pm
Barberi International Inc. based in Miami is recalling Sunmba brand frozen Ajiaco vegetable mix from stores across Florida because of positive test results for Listeria monocytogenes. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 12:28 pm
Emporium Drug Mart, Inc., 988 F.2d 587 (5th Cir. 1993), held that a seller’s offering to sell products and stocking shelves with those products did not amount to a misleading representation that the seller was “authorized” to sell those products. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:26 pm
Emporium Drug Mart, Inc., of Lafayette, 988 F.2d 587, 593 (5th Cir.1993), which held that “the mere unauthorized stocking and sale of trademarked products is not a trademark violation. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Most consumers agree that intellectual property law is essential to ensure that creators of inventions, ideas, designs, services and the like are rewarded for their creativity and to promote the continuation of such creations.[1] In order to grant creators with the incentive to continue creating, such creators must be equipped with the satisfaction of knowing that their creations will not be transformed into cheap imitations which will inevitably compete with their own original creations. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
